[z-machine] Small contribution to the ZMachine specs

Johnny Billquist bqt at update.uu.se
Mon Mar 27 00:25:58 BST 2006


It's doable to do a clean-room implementation based on the Z-machine 
standard spec. I almost did that myself. I stole an idea about how to 
handle dynamic memory from I think it was Frotz, but that's about it. 
Didn't look much further into Frotz, since there wasn't much point in it.

	Johnny

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On 3/26/06, Chris Pickett <chris.pickett at mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Have you looked at frotz?  I suppose it can be considered as a kind of
>>reference implementation.  It sounds like you're trying a clean-room
>>approach though, so maybe you don't want to do that...
>>
> 
> 
> Yeah, we're "spiritually" trying to do a clean-room implementation --
> not for any legal reasons.  Our hope is that one would be able to
> write a z-machine by using nothing but the spec.  I suppose we can
> always look at frotz, malyon.el, or any number of other
> implementations.  We'd still like to see the spec clarified, though. 
> :-)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Z-machine mailing list
> Z-machine at feelies.org
> http://www.feelies.org/mailman/listinfo/z-machine

-- 
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                   ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at update.uu.se           ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol



More information about the Z-machine mailing list